ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning time-series modeling for assessing land subsidence under reduced groundwater use.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensive groundwater extraction and a severe 2021 drought have worsened land subsidence in Taiwan's Choshui Delta, highlighting the need for effective predictive modeling to guide mitigation. In this study, we develop a machine learning framework for subsidence analysis using electricity consumption data from pumping wells as a proxy for groundwater extraction. A long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network is trained to reconstruct missing subsidence records and forecast subsidence trends, while an artificial neural network links well electricity usage to groundwater level fluctuations. Using these tools, we identify groundwater-level decline from pumping as a key driver of subsidence. The LSTM model achieves high accuracy in reproducing historical subsidence and provides reliable predictions of subsidence behavior. Scenario simulations indicate that reducing groundwater pumping, simulated by lowering well electricity use, allows groundwater levels to recover and significantly slows the rate of land subsidence. To assess the effectiveness of pumping reduction strategies, two artificial scenarios were simulated. The average subsidence rate at the Xiutan Elementary School multi-layer compression monitoring well (MLCW) decreased from 2.23 cm/year (observed) to 1.94 cm/year in first scenario and 1.34 cm/year in second scenario, demonstrating the potential of groundwater control in mitigating land subsidence. These findings underscore the importance of integrating groundwater-use indicators into subsidence models and demonstrate that curtailing groundwater extraction can effectively mitigate land subsidence in vulnerable deltaic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.