Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846880›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effect of WWTP products amendments on Phaseolus vulgaris rhizosphere and its ability to inactivate clarithromycin.

Lucie Kotrbová, Kateřina Grabicová, Helena Švecová, Andrea Vojs Staňová, Martina Petrlíková, Roman Grabic, Radka Kodešová, Alica Chroňáková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucie KotrbováDepartment of Ecosystem, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Kateřina GrabicováFaculty of Fisheries and Protections of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Vodňany, Czech Republic.
Helena ŠvecováFaculty of Fisheries and Protections of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Vodňany, Czech Republic.
Andrea Vojs StaňováFaculty of Fisheries and Protections of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Vodňany, Czech Republic.
Martina PetrlíkováInstitute of Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry, Biology Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Roman GrabicFaculty of Fisheries and Protections of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Vodňany, Czech Republic.
Radka KodešováDepartment of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Faculty of Agrobiology, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alica ChroňákováInstitute of Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry, Biology Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. alica.chronakova@upb.cas.cz.

Funding

Grantová agentura Jihočeské univerzity v Českých Budějovicích 063/2023/PMinisterstvo Zemědělství QK21020080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing efforts to reuse wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) products in agriculture, assessing their impact on soil-plant systems is crucial, while the effects of accompanying antibiotic residues on soil microbial communities have not yet been adequately studied. This study focuses on clarithromycin (CLR), highly present in wastewater, and investigates the CLR-degradation potential of plant-associated microorganisms. Phaseolus vulgaris plants were grown in raised beds filled with Haplic Cambisol and amended with or without WWTP products (treated wastewater, biosolid, or composted biosolid), as a source of CLR residues. The rhizosphere microbiomes after biosolid amendments was significantly enriched by Pseudomonadaceae as assessed by 16S rRNA metagenomics and cultures enriched by CLR revealed dominance of Proteobacteria. However, no degradation of CLR by microbial consortia or enrichment cultures was observed, suggesting the multiplication of CLR-resistant bacteria with other resistance mechanisms. Cultivation-based approach combined with antibiotic modulation assays and subsequent LC-MS analysis confirmed the complete CLR removal by seven phylogenetic groups of actinomycetes in vitro. The proportion of isolates indicated that the rhizosphere is a natural reservoir for CLR-inactivating microorganisms; however, the amendment of soils with WWTP products can significantly increase their abundance and diversity.

Indexed as

ClarithromycinPhaseolusRhizosphereWastewaterWater PollutantsAgricultural IrrigationBacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyClarithromycinRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWastewaterWater PollutantsAntimicrobial resistanceBiodegradationMacrolidesMicropollutantsSoil microbiomeStreptomyces

Identifiers

PMID40846880
PMCPMC12373788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.