ArticleScientific reports2025
Delirium as a mediating factor in the survival benefits of dexmedetomidine in acute brain injury management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sedation as an Immunomodulator of Inflammatory Responses in the Lung-Brain Axis of ARDS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Real-World Evidence for Combination Sedation: Propofol Plus Dexmedetomidine and Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Article
- Dexmedetomidine's Role in Adult ICU After 20 Years of Experience-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute brain injury (ABI) is a leading cause of ICU admission and mortality. Effective sedation is essential for preventing secondary brain injury, and dexmedetomidine has emerged as a potential neuroprotective agent. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the MIMIC-IV v3.1 database, including adult patients admitted to the ICU with ABI. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received dexmedetomidine. Propensity score matching (PSM), weighting methods, and doubly robust estimation were used to adjust for confounding factors. Results from the doubly robust analysis showed that dexmedetomidine use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.35-0.48, p < 0.001) and ICU mortality (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.41, p < 0.001). Additionally, dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly increased vasopressor-free days (MD: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.98-3.30, p < 0.001) and ventilation-free days (MD: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.59-2.86, p < 0.001). Further mediation analysis indicated that delirium mediated 37% of the effect of dexmedetomidine on in-hospital mortality and 60% of its effect on ICU mortality. This suggests that delirium may be a key mediator of dexmedetomidine's beneficial effects, consistent with its potential advantages in sedation and neuroprotection observed in previous studies. In conclusion, dexmedetomidine use in ICU patients with ABI is associated with significantly lower mortality and improved clinical outcomes, with delirium acting as a critical mediator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.