ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
When right side up is upside down: Vertical attention bias tracks interactive feature regularities in upright and inverted images.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously proposed a Vertical Attention Bias (VAB) that directs attention toward object tops and scene bottoms and robustly confirmed this effect in both adults and 4- to 7-year-old children. Our past findings are consistent with progressive ecological theory, and support that our perceptual biases are coupled to informative environmental regularities. This leads observers to generally favor a downward gaze to facilitate attending more to functionally and behaviorally relevant locations. Here, we examine orientation effects using upright or inverted images presented in triptych sets to further test the overall VAB pattern. Participants made similarity judgments between a central target image of an object or scene and flanking images containing either the same top-half or the same bottom-half as the target image. Experiment 1 presented upright triptych images and replicated past VAB findings. Experiment 2 presented the same triptychs in an inverted orientation. In this context, the environmental regularity of interactive feature placement is incongruent with conventional spatial location in the presented image. Here object and scene tops are positioned in the lower image portion, and bottoms in the upper image portion. Results extend previous findings and confirm that VAB effects favoring object tops and scene bottoms flip along with the inverted image, though statistically weaker. Taken together, the findings support that the typical vertical interactive feature imbalance in real-world stimuli drives a generic downward vantage tendency. This directs attention toward the locations of meaningful, behaviorally relevant environmental aspects, which helps focus attention on personal action space and body-level affordances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40846825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.