Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846822›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Decoding target discriminability and time pressure using eye and head movement features in a foraging search task.

Anthony J Ries, Chloe Callahan-Flintoft, Anna Madison, Louis Dankovich, Jonathan Touryan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony J RiesHumans in Complex Systems, U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, 7101 Mulberry Point Rd, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA. Anthony.j.ries2.civ@army.mil.ORCID 0009-0004-3440-6276
Chloe Callahan-FlintoftHumans in Complex Systems, U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, 7101 Mulberry Point Rd, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA.
Anna MadisonHumans in Complex Systems, U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, 7101 Mulberry Point Rd, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA.
Louis DankovichHumans in Complex Systems, U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, 7101 Mulberry Point Rd, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA.
Jonathan TouryanHumans in Complex Systems, U.S. Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, 7101 Mulberry Point Rd, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA.

Funding

Army Research Laboratory W911NF-23-2-0205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In military operations, rapid and accurate decision-making is crucial, especially in visually complex and high-pressure environments. This study investigates how eye and head movement metrics can infer changes in search behavior during a naturalistic shooting scenario in virtual reality (VR). Thirty-one participants performed a foraging search task using a head-mounted display (HMD) with integrated eye tracking. Participants searched for targets among distractors under varying levels of target discriminability (easy vs. hard) and time pressure (low vs. high). As expected, behavioral results indicated that increased discrimination difficulty and greater time pressure negatively impacted performance, leading to slower response times and reduced d-prime. Support vector classifiers assigned a search condition, discriminability and time pressure, to each trial based on eye and head movement features. Combined eye and head features produced the most accurate classification model for capturing tasked-induced changes in search behavior, with the combined model outperforming those based on eye or head features alone. While eye features demonstrated strong predictive power, the inclusion of head features significantly enhanced model performance. Across the ensemble of eye metrics, fixation-related features were the most robust for classifying target discriminability, while saccadic-related features played a similar role for time pressure. In contrast, models constrained to head metrics emphasized global movement (amplitude, velocity) for classifying discriminability but shifted toward kinematic intensity (acceleration, jerk) in time pressure condition. Together these results speak to the complementary role of eye and head movements in understanding search behavior under changing task parameters.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsHead MovementsPsychomotor PerformanceAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeVirtual RealityYoung AdultCognitive stateEye trackingHead movementsMachine learningMulticlass classificationSupport vector machineTask predictionVirtual realityVisual foragingVisual search

Identifiers

PMID40846822
PMCPMC12373606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.