ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
Assessing the impact of railway traffic types on human annoyance in residential area due to ground-borne vibrations.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rail transport represents an environmentally sustainable mode of transportation, with traffic volumes anticipated to rise in the coming decades. However, there is limited understanding of its impact on the residential area of human annoyance that affects the quality of life for residents near railway lines. This study evaluated the effect of types of train traffic-induced ground-borne vibrations on human annoyance. It is challenging to accurately assess the impact of vibration exposure caused by rail traffic. There is currently a lack of reliable models to evaluate vibration exposure. However, the distance from the railway track appears to be the most effective indicator of exposure to vibrations from rail traffic. The result presents the association between characterisation and annoyance from vibrations and its stratification by train type. Furthermore, speed, distance, and operational time were evaluated as the key factors influencing the relationship between survey results and field tests. High-speed trains are notably associated with increased annoyance levels, with 17 respondents reporting being highly annoyed and 26 reporting annoyance out of 208 total respondents due to elevated vibration exposure, highlighting the significant vibrations in causing discomfort and annoyance among residents. Hence, this study examines the impact of train-induced ground-borne vibrations on the human annoyance for residents near railway lines. Using field tests and surveys, it highlights the need for balancing sustainable rail transportation with minimising its negative effects on nearby communities and implementing measures to reduce vibrations and address human annoyance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.