Trial reportClinical oral investigations2025
Bleaching with biocatalysts and violet LED: a randomized clinical trial using a hybrid design with parallel-group and split-mouth approaches : Violet LED and biocatalysts in in-office whitening: a split-mouth trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare conventional 35% hydrogen peroxide whitening for 45 min with test therapies lasting 15 min using a polymeric scaffold, peroxidase, and violet LED. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty patients were randomized into three groups (n = 20): TC45 (35% HP for 45'), T15 (35% HP for 15'), and TT (polycaprolactone scaffold + 35% HP with peroxidase for 15'). One hemiarch was irradiated with violet LED (L) (8 cycles of 1 min, with 30-second intervals). ΔE
resultsThe TT group showed ΔE
conclusionTherapies using scaffold and peroxidase, with or without LED, were effective, safe, and less sensitive, representing promising alternatives to conventional whitening, even with a two-third reduction in application time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Whitening therapies using polymeric scaffold and peroxidase, with or without violet LED, are effective, safe, and cause less sensitivity, representing promising alternatives to conventional whitening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40846796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.