Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846779›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Travel distance and potential disparities in palliative radiotherapy access for cancer patients in Victoria, Australia.

Maike Trommer, Piers Gillett, Fanny Franchini, Karen Trapani, Colin Hornby, Skye Abraham, Dishan Herath, Karla Gough, Keith Donohoe, Phillip Tran and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trends in radiation oncology between 2015 and 2022: report from a German university radio-oncology department.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maike TrommerAustin Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia. maike.trommer@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-4273
Piers GillettCancer Health Services Research (CHSR), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Fanny FranchiniCancer Health Services Research (CHSR), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Karen TrapaniCancer Health Services Research (CHSR), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Colin HornbyDepartment of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Melbourne, Australia.
Skye AbrahamCancer Health Services Research (CHSR), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Dishan HerathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Karla GoughDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria 3000, Melbourne, Australia.
Keith DonohoeRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
Phillip TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Farshad ForoudiAustin Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Maarten IJzermanCancer Health Services Research (CHSR), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Richard KhorAustin Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund MRF1199701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative radiotherapy (PRT) is crucial for improving quality of life in patients with advanced-staged cancer. This large data analysis investigates the travel distances and potential disparities in PRT access especially focusing on the burden of excess travel for palliative cancer patients in Victoria, Australia.

methodsUsing a state-wide linked dataset from the PRedicting the health economic IMPact of new and current Cancer Treatments (PRIMCAT) research program, we analysed the estimated road travel distance (ERTD) and potential excess travel distance (PETD) as well as received radiotherapy fractions for 29,807 PRT patients being treated from 2010-2019. We examined disparities by socioeconomic status (SEIFA) and remoteness (RA) of the residential area of PRT patients, and receiving treatment at a public or private centre.

resultsThe average one-way ERTD for all PRT patients was 43 km, with variations based on SEIFA and RA. Patients in the lowest SEIFA quintile and those living in outer regional areas had the longest ERTD. Approximately 50% did not receive treatment at the closest facility, with a mean PETD of 27.9 km for private and 24.3 km for public facility patients. Fractionation patterns showed no significant reduction in the number of fractions with increased travel distance. Patients at private facilities received more fractions on average (8.49) compared to those at public facilities (5.91).

conclusionThis study highlights potential disparities in PRT access in Victoria, with patients living in socioeconomically disadvantaged and remote regions facing longer travel distances and excess travel. These findings underscore the need for strategic referral practices and further research to optimise equitable access to PRT.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsPalliative CareTravelAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial ClassCancer healthcare equityDisparities in radiotherapy accessPalliative radiotherapySocioeconomic statusTravel distance

Identifiers

PMID40846779
PMCPMC12701006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.