ArticleScientific reports2025
Constructing a predictive model for acute mastitis in lactating women based on machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New Personalized Medicine Model for Medication Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute lactational mastitis is a frequently occurring complication for lactating women, exerting a certain degree of influence on their physical condition, breastfeeding, mental health, and daily life. The etiology of this disease is complex, and the early symptoms lack typicality. Delayed diagnosis often occurs, which further progresses to abscess or more severe infections, adversely affecting the therapeutic effect and eventually leading to a prolonged recovery process and triggering other complications. Nevertheless, currently, the research regarding the risk factors of acute mastitis that occurs during lactation remains unfinished. This study employed a retrospective case-control study approach and collected relevant data from 369 patients with acute mastitis and 447 healthy controls. The involved data covered indicators such as age, parity, history of breast surgery, etc. By using machine learning (ML) algorithms (Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), XGBoost, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)) to train and validate the above data, it aimed to construct a predictive model of the risk factors for the occurrence of acute mastitis in lactating women, and simultaneously analyzed the other influences and effects of these factors on acute mastitis. The ML model demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating patients with acute mastitis from non-patients. We evaluated twelve indicators, namely age, primiparity, history of breast surgery, cracked, external breast trauma, puerperium, gestational diabetes, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophils (NE), white blood cells (WBC), and abnormal nipple discharge, to determine their influence on the occurrence of acute mastitis in lactating women. Prediction models were established using four different ML algorithms. Through analysis, when comparing the four distinct ML models on the test set, the MLP model performed optimally across various evaluation metrics, including the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC) (0.898), sensitivity (0.820), test specificity (0.863), and F1 score (0.849), with an accuracy of 0.840. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) indicates that within the majority of threshold ranges, the MLP can achieve the highest net benefit. Among these twelve indicators, five are significantly related to the occurrence of acute mastitis, namely age, cracked, CRP, NE, and WBC. We have successfully developed a prediction model for acute lactational mastitis and identified five key indicators closely related to its occurrence. This study effectively predicts the occurrence of acute lactational mastitis and provides a reference for the timely implementation of targeted clinical interventions as well as accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.