ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction of speed of sound in fatty acid ethyl esters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research explores the application of fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) in the pharmaceutical industry due to their biodegradable, renewable nature and versatility as excipients or drug delivery agents. The research seeks to create predictive models utilizing various methods in machine learning to calculate the speed of sound in FAEEs under different temperature, pressure, molar mass, and elemental composition conditions. Laboratory data figures from earlier research were used to train the models. Among the models developed, CNN was recognized as the most accurate model for predicting the speed of sound. This conclusion was drawn from extensive statistical evaluations and visualization techniques. CNN achieved an R² value of 0.9996, with low average absolute relative error and mean squared error, outperforming other tested algorithms. The dataset, consisting of 371 experimental data points, was validated using the Leverage algorithm to ensure reliability. Further analysis showed that pressure is the most influential factor, followed by temperature, as confirmed by sensitivity and SHAP analyses. The proposed framework provides a reliable, cost-effective alternative to experimental methods for estimating sound speed in FAEEs under various physical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.