ArticleScientific reports2025
Development, validation, and application of a dual-color fluorescent assay for high-throughput screening of anti-chikungunya drugs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), one of the arthropod-borne viruses, has been affecting the global population for more than 70 years since it was first described with more than 620,000 cases in 2024 alone. Despite its long-standing problem, the only treatment available for chikungunya-infected patients is supportive treatment to alleviate pain. Fluorescent molecules have been used in detecting viral infection in the host cells via immunofluorescence assays because of their sensitivity. This study aimed to use this assay to rapidly screen efficacy and cytotoxicity of several compounds in a high-throughput manner. The optimized conditions were to seed Vero cells at 10,000 cells/well, and infect them with CHIKV ECSA at MOI of 0.1. These conditions resulted in a good discrimination power between infected wells and uninfected wells and minimized the cytopathic effect on host cells. Validation using two compounds with known activity against CHIKV, cycloheximide (CHX), and acyclovir (ACY), showed that the assay could properly identify active compounds and inactive compounds correctly. There was also no significant difference between the results of 3 independent rounds of compound screening, thus showing the reproducibility of the assay. Traditional primary screening were performed in parallel with the dual-color fluorescent assay for 60 unknown compounds to evaluate inhibition performance of inhibition and approximate cytotoxicity assessment. The results showed excellent performance from the analysis of the ROC curves and general agreement between two approaches from the Bland-Altman plots. Overall, the developed assay required less labor while being able to screen more compounds than the traditional assay in one round of experiment. The assay is currently being tested to screen libraries of compounds and so far, has been able to identify 22 hits for further characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.