Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846730›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development, validation, and application of a dual-color fluorescent assay for high-throughput screening of anti-chikungunya drugs.

Pattadon Sawetpiyakul, Duangpron Peypala, Pathaphon Wiriwithya, Gridsada Phanomchoeng, Tanatorn Khotavivattana, Warintorn Chavasiri, Sittiporn Pattaradilokrat, Siwaporn Boonyasuppayakorn

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pattadon SawetpiyakulCenter of Excellence in Applied Medical Virology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Duangpron PeypalaCenter of Excellence in Applied Medical Virology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Pathaphon WiriwithyaCenter of Excellence in Applied Medical Virology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Gridsada PhanomchoengCenter of Excellence in Applied Medical Virology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Tanatorn KhotavivattanaCenter of Excellence in Natural Product, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Warintorn ChavasiriCenter of Excellence in Natural Product, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sittiporn PattaradilokratDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Siwaporn BoonyasuppayakornCenter of Excellence in Applied Medical Virology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Siwaporn.b@chula.ac.th.

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand N42A670553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), one of the arthropod-borne viruses, has been affecting the global population for more than 70 years since it was first described with more than 620,000 cases in 2024 alone. Despite its long-standing problem, the only treatment available for chikungunya-infected patients is supportive treatment to alleviate pain. Fluorescent molecules have been used in detecting viral infection in the host cells via immunofluorescence assays because of their sensitivity. This study aimed to use this assay to rapidly screen efficacy and cytotoxicity of several compounds in a high-throughput manner. The optimized conditions were to seed Vero cells at 10,000 cells/well, and infect them with CHIKV ECSA at MOI of 0.1. These conditions resulted in a good discrimination power between infected wells and uninfected wells and minimized the cytopathic effect on host cells. Validation using two compounds with known activity against CHIKV, cycloheximide (CHX), and acyclovir (ACY), showed that the assay could properly identify active compounds and inactive compounds correctly. There was also no significant difference between the results of 3 independent rounds of compound screening, thus showing the reproducibility of the assay. Traditional primary screening were performed in parallel with the dual-color fluorescent assay for 60 unknown compounds to evaluate inhibition performance of inhibition and approximate cytotoxicity assessment. The results showed excellent performance from the analysis of the ROC curves and general agreement between two approaches from the Bland-Altman plots. Overall, the developed assay required less labor while being able to screen more compounds than the traditional assay in one round of experiment. The assay is currently being tested to screen libraries of compounds and so far, has been able to identify 22 hits for further characterization.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysAcyclovirAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCycloheximideDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansVero CellsAcyclovirAntiviral AgentsCycloheximideAntiviralsChikungunya virusDrug discoveryDual color fluorescent assayHigh-throughput screening

Identifiers

PMID40846730
PMCPMC12373836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.