ArticleScientific reports2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding home-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with chronic heart failure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards cardiac rehabilitation among patients with heart failure.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Factors influencing sodium restriction behavior among patients with chronic heart failure: a cross-sectional study based on the value co-creation theory.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of cardiac rehabilitation-related short Chinese videos on Douyin and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Recognition of worsening heart failure symptoms, help-seeking attitudes, and time-to-presentation in chronic heart failure: a single-center KAP study in China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic heart failure (CHF) represents an escalating public health issue characterized by high rates of morbidity, mortality, and increasing healthcare expenditures. Although home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) has been proven effective in managing CHF, patient engagement remains suboptimal. This study aimed to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) associated with HBCR in patients with CHF. This cross-sectional study was conducted between April and July 2024 at Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital. Data were collected via a questionnaire that included demographic information and assessed participants' KAP scores. A total of 591 patients with CHF participated in the study. Among them, 349 (59.05%) were male, and 355 (60.07%) had a history of cardiovascular disease. The mean scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice were 7.27 ± 4.43 (range: 0-18), 29.18 ± 5.31 (range: 8-40), and 34.57 ± 5.57 (range: 10-50), respectively, indicating low knowledge but moderate attitudes and practices. Correlation analysis showed significant positive relationships between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.315, P < 0.001), knowledge and practice (r = 0.329, P < 0.001), and attitude and practice (r = 0.502, P < 0.001). Mediation analysis revealed that knowledge had a direct effect on attitude (β = 0.408, P = 0.008) and practice (β = 0.206, P = 0.011), while attitude also directly affected practice (β = 0.440, P = 0.008). Furthermore, knowledge indirectly influenced practice through attitude (β = 0.179, P = 0.006). Patients with CHF demonstrated limited knowledge but moderate attitudes and practices toward HBCR, underscoring the need for enhanced educational interventions. Clinicians are encouraged to implement more comprehensive educational programs that target KAP dimensions to optimize patients' participation of HBCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.