Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846725›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing ensemble learning for satellite-based multi-hazard monitoring and susceptibility assessment of landslides, land subsidence, floods, and wildfires.

Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh, Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki, Farman Ali, Biswajeet Pradhan, Soo-Mi Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seyed Vahid Razavi-TermehDept. of Computer Science and Engineering and Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drone, XR Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abolghasem Sadeghi-NiarakiDept. of Computer Science and Engineering and Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drone, XR Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. a.sadeghi@sejong.ac.kr.
Farman AliDepartment of Applied AI, School of Convergence, College of Computing and Informatics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 03063, Republic of Korea.
Biswajeet PradhanCentre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Soo-Mi ChoiDept. of Computer Science and Engineering and Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drone, XR Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the ITRC Support Program under Grant IITP-2024-RS-2022-00156354 and in part by the Metaverse Support Program to Nurture the Best Talents under Grant IITP-2024-RS-2023-00254529 funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea and the Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (IITP). Grant IITP-2024-RS-2023-00254529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preparation of accurate multi-hazard susceptibility maps is essential to effective disaster risk management. Past studies have relied mainly on traditional machine learning models, but these models do not perform well for complex spatial patterns. To address this gap, this study uses two meta-heuristic algorithms (Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)) to provide an optimized Random Forest (RF) model with better predictive ability. We focus on four significant hazards-landslides, land subsidence, wildfires, and floods-in Kurdistan Province, Iran, using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery collected between 2015 and 2022. Furthermore, two models of RF-GA and RF-PSO were utilized to create multi-hazard susceptibility, which were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). The RF-GA algorithm achieved 91.1% accuracy for flood hazards, 83.8% for wildfires, and 99.1% for landslide hazards. In contrast, utilizing RF-PSO resulted in a 95.9% accuracy for land subsidence hazards. The combined RF-GA algorithm demonstrated superior accuracy to individual RF modeling techniques. Furthermore, eastern regions are more prone to floods and land subsidence, whereas western areas face more significant risks from landslides and wildfires. Additionally, floods and land subsidence exhibit a considerable correlation, impacting each other's occurrence, while wildfires and landslides demonstrate interacting dynamics, influencing each other's likelihood of occurrence.

Indexed as

Machine learningMulti-hazardRemote sensingRisk assessmentSpatial prediction

Identifiers

PMID40846725
PMCPMC12373892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.