ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Development of Infants' Positive Reactivity.
Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Development of Infants' Positive Reactivity.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the development of positive affect during early infancy across cultures, we conducted a joyful affect-eliciting dyadic face-to-face interaction between a female experimenter and 3- and 4.5-month-old infants from Münster (urban Germany; n = 20 at 3 months, n = 20 at 4.5 months) and indigenous Kichwa families from the Andean context (rural Ecuador; n = 24 at 3 months, n = 27 at 4.5 months), which differ in their ethnotheories about infants' ideal affect. Results pointed to cross-cultural differences in infants' affective reactivity to high-intensity stimulation, namely higher intensities of positive affect at 3 months in Münster as compared to Kichwa infants that disappeared at 4.5 months of age. The findings serve as an important complement to naturalistic studies that have left open the question of the developmental continuity of cross-cultural differences in infant positive affect beyond 3 months. We discuss our findings in terms of a dynamic interaction between culturally informed parent-infant interactions and biological potentials that give rise to both cross-cultural similarities and differences in the course of emotional development, even in early infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.