ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2025
Improving Wound Care in Residential Aged Care Facilities: Development, Validation and Use of a Novel Knowledge Translation Framework.
Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric testing of the measure for unfinished care among nursing assistants in long-term care homes in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Improving Wound Care in Residential Aged Care Facilities: Development, Validation and Use of a Novel Knowledge Translation Framework.International journal of older people nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWounds and skin conditions are common in residential aged care settings and can result in significant physical, psychosocial and economic impacts on residents and care systems. Ensuring high-quality evidence-based wound and skin care in residential aged care facilities is essential to promote resident well-being. However, the integration of such practices is a complex knowledge translation endeavour, influenced by contextual challenges. A comprehensive, systematic and theory-based framework can be used to guide the complex process. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a framework for wound care knowledge translation in residential aged care facilities.
methodA multi-method, three-phase design was used. Phase 1 involved two systematic reviews to identify elements from theoretical and empirical perspectives, resulting in a draft framework. Phase 2 consisted of an online participatory design workshop with 10 key stakeholders to contextualise the elements identified in Phase 1. In Phase 3, a two-round modified e-Delphi process was conducted with 11 international experts to refine and validate the framework.
resultsThe developed framework, which recognises knowledge translation as a process, comprises four vertical phases: pre-implementation, implementation, evaluation and sustainment. Additionally, it includes four horizontal components: Process steps, Adoption process, Values as a moral compass and Engagement for individual behaviour change and team development. Consensus was reached on the 'PAVE' framework's comprehensiveness, relevance, usability and value for guiding knowledge translation in residential aged care facilities.
conclusionThe PAVE framework offers a tool for implementation scientists, gerontology nurses and researchers to plan and guide knowledge translation for establishing evidence-based wound and skin care practices in residential aged care facilities, improving the quality and safety of care to older people. The framework holds potential for broader application across various interventions and healthcare settings. Future studies should explore the PAVE framework's effectiveness in diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.