ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Task shifting: a key aspect to improving care for women at risk of preterm birth.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
local problemUntil April 2021, women presenting to maternity triage with symptoms of threatened preterm labour (TPTL) and/or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) were triaged by a doctor. Depending on the acuity on the labour ward, women in triage often had a long wait for a doctor's review. These delays create anxiety for women and impair the capacity of triage midwives to care for other women.
methodsThe Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement was used for this project. 3 months prior to the intervention, the baseline assessment was women's wait time for medical review when presenting with TPTL and/or PPROM.
interventionTriage midwives were trained in performing speculum examination on preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) women to allow quicker review. Waiting time for review by a midwife vs doctor was compared using data collected between January and December 2021.
results88 eligible women were identified. 44 cases (intervention group) had their initial assessment by the triage midwife, while 44 cases (control group) had their initial assessment by a doctor. The mean waiting time between arrival and performance of quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) in the intervention group was 67 min (SD=42.7), compared with 127 min (SD=61.2) in the control group (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the waiting time between arrival and discharge/admission.
conclusionWomen presenting with symptoms of TPTL are reviewed on average twice as quickly by the triage midwife compared with a doctor, allowing a quick reassurance for those where TPTL/PPROM has been excluded. However, the overall waiting time in triage was similar, as women in our unit currently need a doctor's review before discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.