Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846340›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Belgian primary care and hospital settings on the effectiveness of an eHealth self-management support programme consisting of pain education and coaching of activity needs in breast cancer survivors with persistent pain: the PECAN trial.

An De Groef, Lore Dams, G Lorimer Moseley, Lauren C Heathcote, Louise K Wiles, Mark Catley, Anna Vogelzang, Peter Hibbert, Bart Morlion, Marthe Van Overbeke and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06308029 (Effectiveness of an eHealth Self-management Support Program for Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06308029 narecruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of an eHealth Self-management Support Program for Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiteit AntwerpenRan2024 to 2029Enrolled270ConditionsBreast CancerArmseHealth self-management support program, Face-to-face rehabilitation program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

An De GroefDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium an.degroef@uantwerpen.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-2836
Lore DamsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
G Lorimer MoseleyInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lauren C HeathcoteHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, Londen, UK.
Louise K WilesInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mark CatleyInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anna VogelzangInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter HibbertInnovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Bart MorlionDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anaesthesiology & Algology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marthe Van OverbekeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Emma TackDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sophie Van DijckDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Nele DevoogdtDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-7080
Ceren GursenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-8364
Annick L De PaepeDepartment of Experimental-Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Michel MertensDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7170-3518
Josefien van OlmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Lander WillemDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Wiebren TjalmaMultidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ines NevelsteenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick NevenDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rani VanhoudtDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Davina WildemeerschFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Femke De BackereIDLab, Department of Information Technology - imec, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Steffen FieuwsDepartment of Public Health, Interuniversity Center for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert CrombezDepartment of Experimental-Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Mira MeeusDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPersistent pain after finishing breast cancer treatment is a common and disabling problem. The current state-of-the-art pain management advocates, in addition to biomedical (non-)pharmacological approaches, a biopsychosocial rehabilitation approach to address persistent pain, combining pain science education with promoting an active lifestyle through self-regulation techniques. We propose testing an innovative eHealth self-management support programme for this purpose in the breast cancer population with persistent pain after finishing cancer treatment. This delivery mode is believed to reduce barriers to pain self-management by providing timely, safe and cost-effective assistance addressing the biopsychosocial needs of patients. Utilising a chatbot format, the eHealth programme delivers pain science education and promotes physical activity (PA), personalised through decision-tree-based algorithms to support pain self-management. The programme aims to empower patients with understanding, coping skills and self-management techniques to reduce pain-related disability and enhance participation in daily life. The primary objective is to determine programme effectiveness compared with (1) usual care (superiority) and (2) a similar face-to-face pain self-management support programme (non-inferiority). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic, three-arm randomised controlled trial was started in April 2024 at the University Hospitals of Antwerp and Leuven and primary care settings in Belgium. Participants are breast cancer survivors with persistent pain after finishing cancer treatment. Two hundred seventy participants will be randomised to one of three trial arms: (1) eHealth self-management support programme, (2) usual care or (3) a face-to-face self-management support programme. The 'eHealth self-management support programme' begins with a pain science education (PSE) module to initially convey key pain-related concepts and provide personalised pain management tips. Then, the programme progresses to daily activity planning to promote an active lifestyle. Guided by the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model, participants set and review daily activity goals and track progress. The eHealth self-management programme uses a chatbot and is accessible on any digital device. The 'usual care programme' involves sending the participants a study-specific brochure by postal mail and does not include any formal PSE and/or PA programmes. They may pursue or continue self-initiated care. In Belgium, usual care primarily involves pharmacological treatment, general advice on PA and the provision of informational brochures. The 'face-to-face self-management support programme' mirrors the eHealth intervention, combining PSE with PA coaching. It starts with three individual sessions with a trained physical therapist for biopsychosocial assessment and PSE, followed by six sessions on goal setting and active lifestyle coaching. The educational content is delivered both verbally and in written form. The primary outcome will be pain-related disability 6 months after baseline assessment. As a key secondary outcome, the effect on pain beliefs and attitudes will be investigated after the educational part of the eHealth and face-to-face programme (ie, at 6 weeks after baseline). Other secondary outcomes related to other dimensions of pain and physical-, psychosocial- and health-economic outcomes will be assessed at 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months after baseline as well. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2024). The protocol has been approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospitals of Leuven and Antwerp. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at congresses. Ethical Committee of the University Hospitals Leuven and Antwerp: BUN B3002023000132. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06308029.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsPain ManagementPatient Education as TopicSelf-ManagementBelgiumEquivalence Trials as TopicExerciseFemaleHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineeHealthONCOLOGYPAIN MANAGEMENTREHABILITATION MEDICINESelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID40846340
PMCPMC12374636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.