Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40846327›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Development and evaluation of the first fertility preservation patient decision aid to support boys and young men with cancer: The Cancer, Fertility and Me for Boys and Young Men research protocol.

Georgina Louise Jones, Danielle Sarah Musson, Nicola O'Donnell, Abigail Lewis, Maximilian Williamson, Dan Yeomanson, Allan Pacey, Sheila Lane, Anne-Mairead Folan, Brendan Gough and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Georgina Louise JonesPsychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK g.l.jones@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Danielle Sarah MussonPsychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1035-469X
Nicola O'DonnellPsychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Abigail LewisCentre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Maximilian WilliamsonQueen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Dan YeomansonSheffield Children's NHS Foundation, Sheffield, UK.
Allan PaceySchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-8871
Sheila LaneOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Anne-Mairead FolanPsychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Brendan GoughPsychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Bob PhillipsCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4938-9673
Carol PorteousEdinburgh Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Richard AndersonCentre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rod Thomas MitchellCentre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany cancer treatments can result in reduced fertility, impacting survivors' opportunities for biological parenthood. Fertility preservation (FP) methods for boys and young men, such as cryopreservation of testicular tissue or sperm, offer hope but are currently underused among young male patients with cancer. Despite guidelines recommending early discussion of fertility implications, many newly diagnosed males do not receive FP counselling or referral to fertility services. Male cancer survivors face a higher likelihood of infertility than their peers, yet focused FP decision-making support is lacking. This study aims to address this gap by developing and evaluating the first dedicated patient decision aid (PtDA) for boys and young male patients with cancer aged 11-25 years old, to help them make informed FP decisions before receiving cancer treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The current study follows a multistage process: developing the PtDA, alpha testing for acceptability with former patients, parents and healthcare professionals, and beta testing in clinical settings to ensure effective integration into routine care. Using a combination of interviews and questionnaire data, this research will assess the PtDA's acceptability and impact on decision-making. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been prospectively registered on the Research Registry (10273). Ethics approval has been obtained from Leeds Beckett University and the National Health Service/Health Research Authority before undertaking data collection. The final resource will be disseminated widely and made freely available online via our dedicated Cancer, Fertility and Me website, for use in clinical and research practice.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsDecision Support TechniquesFertility PreservationNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultChildDecision MakingHumansInfertility, MaleInterviews as TopicMaleObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesDecision MakingMale infertilityONCOLOGYPaediatric oncologyREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40846327
PMCPMC12374662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.