ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Suicidality Screening: Ensuring Providers Do Not Miss Adolescents at High Risk through Clinical Decision Support.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depression in adolescents is recognized as a serious psychiatric illness and a risk factor for suicide. It is important for providers to screen for depression and suicidality and have clinical decision support (CDS) for evaluation, risk assessment, and initial management. Our efforts focused on leveraging the electronic health record (EHR) to ensure that high-risk adolescents received appropriate interventions before leaving the office.This study aims to improve notification of positive adolescent depression and suicide risk screening results. Subaims include (1) designing and optimizing CDS alerts for severe depression and/or acute lethality; and (2) increasing visibility for different EHR users to avoid the near misses.We implemented several iterations of an interruptive alert after a positive mental health screening for patients aged 12 to 20 years seen in primary care and subspecialty rheumatology clinics between 2016 and 2023. Screening started with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) and Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) on paper, and later via tablets.There were 76,919 visits during the study period, of which 50,502 (66%) completed PHQ screening. Rates of PHQ screening increased throughout the study period. Of the ASQ screenings completed, alerts were fired for 2,355 nonacute positive and 411 acute positive. In most cases, all alerts fired were more than once. Providers and clinicians receiving alerts (physicians, nurse practitioners, social workers, and psychologists) acknowledged 63 to 96% of alerts and cancelled 6 to 70% of alerts. We revised the initial alert identifying lethality to include separate alerts for major depressive symptoms and suicide risk. Iterations also included an icon on the clinic schedule and incorporated guidance on appropriate actions.By creating multiple types of alerting within different workflows, we improved notification and increased next-step visibility, leveraging decision support for patients screening positive for depression and suicidality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.