Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845932›Full record

ReviewImmunology letters2026

Sepsis as a complex syndrome: Are combined biomarkers the future of diagnosis and prognosis? Clinical perspective.

R Ghaderpanah, F van Beuningen, Y Lin, S H Sadrian, H M Reijneveld, H Krabbe, P Jonkheijm, H R Bouma, R T Mankowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R GhaderpanahDepartment of Physiology and Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
F van BeuningenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center of Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Y LinDivision of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
S H SadrianDepartment of Anesthesia and Preoperative Care, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
H M ReijneveldDepartment of Molecules and Materials, MESA+ Institute and TechMed Centre, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
H KrabbeDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
P JonkheijmDepartment of Molecules and Materials, MESA+ Institute and TechMed Centre, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
H R BoumaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center of Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Acute Care, University Medical Center of Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: h.r.bouma@umcg.nl.
R T MankowskiDivision of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: rmankows@uab.edu.

Funding

Understanding pathology of sepsis-induced physical disability for future precision medicine.R35GM151038 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Robert T Mankowski · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM151038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality worldwide, driven by a dysregulated host response to infection that leads to life-threatening organ dysfunction. Despite advances in evidence-based medicine, early diagnosis and risk stratification remain significant challenges due to the complex, multifaceted nature of sepsis and substantial interindividual variability in clinical presentation. Current approaches relying on single biomarkers cannot provide comprehensive insights into disease progression, limiting their clinical utility in guiding timely and effective interventions. Given the limitations of current single biomarkers in capturing the complexity of sepsis, there is an urgent need for improved diagnostic approaches. While the discovery of novel biomarkers remains important, combining existing biomarkers may offer a pragmatic and effective strategy to improve diagnostic accuracy by leveraging the strengths of each to compensate for the limitations of other. In this clinical perspective, we highlight the potential of such combined biomarker strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy, support identification of the infection source, and improve prognostic assessment across the clinical course and into long-term outcomes. We provide examples of key biomarkers and their synergistic potential, emphasizing the need for advanced analytical methods such as machine learning and multi-omics integration to enhance predictive accuracy. Shifting toward multi-component biomarker panels represents a critical step toward a more precise, personalized approach to sepsis management to reduce sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. We advocate for further research and validation efforts to facilitate the clinical implementation of combined biomarker models, ultimately transforming sepsis care.

Indexed as

BiomarkersSepsisHumansPrognosisBiomarkersBiomarkersInfectionLong-term outcomesSepsis

Identifiers

PMID40845932
PMCPMC12449655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.