ArticleJMIR AI2025
Effectiveness of the GPT-4o Model in Interpreting Electrocardiogram Images for Cardiac Diagnostics: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models in Image-Based Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Exploratory Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Diagnostics: Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Multimodal Large Language Models in Electrocardiogram Interpretation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent progress has demonstrated the potential of deep learning models in analyzing electrocardiogram (ECG) pathologies. However, this method is intricate, expensive to develop, and designed for specific purposes. Large language models show promise in medical image interpretation, and yet their effectiveness in ECG analysis remains understudied. Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 Omni (GPT-4o), a multimodal artificial intelligence model, capable of processing images and text without task-specific training, may offer an accessible alternative. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate GPT-4o's effectiveness in interpreting 12-lead ECGs, assessing classification accuracy, and exploring methods to enhance its performance. Methods: A total of 6 common ECG diagnoses were evaluated: normal ECG, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, right bundle branch block, left bundle branch block, and paced rhythm, with 30 normal ECGs and 10 of each abnormal pattern, totaling 80 cases. Deidentified ECGs were analyzed using OpenAI's GPT-4o. Our study used both zero-shot and few-shot learning methodologies to investigate three main scenarios: (1) ECG image recognition, (2) binary classification of normal versus abnormal ECGs, and (3) multiclass classification into 6 categories. Results: The model excelled in recognizing ECG images, achieving an accuracy of 100%. In the classification of normal or abnormal ECG cases, the few-shot learning approach improved GPT-4o's accuracy by 30% from the baseline, reaching 83% (95% CI 81.8%-84.6%). However, multiclass classification for a specific pathology remained limited, achieving only 41% accuracy. Conclusions: GPT-4o effectively differentiates normal from abnormal ECGs, suggesting its potential as an accessible artificial intelligence-assisted triage tool. Although limited in diagnosing specific cardiac conditions, GPT-4o's capability to interpret ECG images without specialized training highlights its potential for preliminary ECG interpretation in clinical and remote settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.