Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845836›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2025

Effectiveness of the GPT-4o Model in Interpreting Electrocardiogram Images for Cardiac Diagnostics: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Haya Engelstein, Roni Ramon-Gonen, Avi Sabbag, Eyal Klang, Karin Sudri, Michal Cohen-Shelly, Israel Barbash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haya Engelstein *Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6721-5158
Roni Ramon-Gonen *The Graduate School of Business Administration, Information Systems Program, Bar-Ilan University, Max and Anna Webb St, Ramat Gan, 5290002, Israel, 972 3-531-8910.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2529-1567
Avi SabbagDavidai Arrhythmia Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-6679
Eyal KlangDivision of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine (D3M), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4567-3108
Karin SudriSheba ARC, Sagol Big Data and AI Hub, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-8619
Michal Cohen-Shelly *Sheba ARC, Sagol Big Data and AI Hub, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6532-9252
Israel Barbash *Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-5989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent progress has demonstrated the potential of deep learning models in analyzing electrocardiogram (ECG) pathologies. However, this method is intricate, expensive to develop, and designed for specific purposes. Large language models show promise in medical image interpretation, and yet their effectiveness in ECG analysis remains understudied. Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 Omni (GPT-4o), a multimodal artificial intelligence model, capable of processing images and text without task-specific training, may offer an accessible alternative. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate GPT-4o's effectiveness in interpreting 12-lead ECGs, assessing classification accuracy, and exploring methods to enhance its performance. Methods: A total of 6 common ECG diagnoses were evaluated: normal ECG, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, right bundle branch block, left bundle branch block, and paced rhythm, with 30 normal ECGs and 10 of each abnormal pattern, totaling 80 cases. Deidentified ECGs were analyzed using OpenAI's GPT-4o. Our study used both zero-shot and few-shot learning methodologies to investigate three main scenarios: (1) ECG image recognition, (2) binary classification of normal versus abnormal ECGs, and (3) multiclass classification into 6 categories. Results: The model excelled in recognizing ECG images, achieving an accuracy of 100%. In the classification of normal or abnormal ECG cases, the few-shot learning approach improved GPT-4o's accuracy by 30% from the baseline, reaching 83% (95% CI 81.8%-84.6%). However, multiclass classification for a specific pathology remained limited, achieving only 41% accuracy. Conclusions: GPT-4o effectively differentiates normal from abnormal ECGs, suggesting its potential as an accessible artificial intelligence-assisted triage tool. Although limited in diagnosing specific cardiac conditions, GPT-4o's capability to interpret ECG images without specialized training highlights its potential for preliminary ECG interpretation in clinical and remote settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiologydecision support systemselectrocardiogramlarge language modelsLLMs

Identifiers

PMID40845836
PMCPMC12375907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.