Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845827›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2025

Minimum nurse staffing policy intervention in Queensland Australia improved nurse wellbeing and patient safety: A quasi-experimental intervention study.

Karen B Lasater, Linda H Aiken, Clint Douglas, Carol Windsor, Patsy Yates, Herbert L Smith, Matthew D McHugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reasons for leaving or remaining in nursing work and profession: a comparative analysis among emergency/urgent care professionals.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen B LasaterCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: karenbl@nursing.upenn.edu.
Linda H AikenCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Clint DouglasSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia; Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Carol WindsorSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia; Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Patsy YatesSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia; Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Herbert L SmithCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew D McHughCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Changes in Nursing Systems and Models of Care on Patient Outcomes: A Panel StudyR01NR014855 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Matthew D. McHugh · 2014 to 2026
$7.5M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse retention and wellbeing have reached alarmingly low levels in recent years and health systems globally are searching for large-scale systemic solutions to reduce nurse burnout, improve wellbeing, and increase job satisfaction and retention while simultaneously enhancing patient care quality and safety.

objectiveTo evaluate whether a minimum nurse staffing policy intervention in Queensland Australia improved nurse wellbeing, intentions to leave employment, and patient safety.

methodsThis is a quasi-experimental intervention study in which we compared nurse outcomes, patient safety measures, quality of care indicators, and operational failures among 27 hospitals subject to a minimum nurse staffing policy (i.e. intervention hospitals) and 41 hospitals not subject to the policy (i.e. comparison hospitals) at two points in time: prior to implementation of the policy (i.e. baseline) and two years after implementation (i.e. post-implementation). Percentages of nurses with unfavorable outcomes and unfavorable ratings of quality of care and patient safety are reported for intervention and comparison hospitals at baseline and post-implementation of the staffing policy. Fixed effects logistic regression models evaluated the interaction between the intervention effect and the post-implementation period to report the impact of the staffing policy on outcomes.

resultsThe minimum nurse staffing policy intervention was associated with improvements in staffing, nurse wellbeing and job outcomes, and quality of care and patient safety in the intervention hospitals. Nurses in intervention hospitals had 24 % lower odds of high burnout (OR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.61-0.94, p < 0.05) and 27 % lower odds of job dissatisfaction (OR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.59-0.91, p < 0.01) at post-implementation relative to the baseline; no statistically significant differences in these outcomes were found among comparison hospitals. Job dissatisfaction with workload, professional development, autonomy at work, and work schedule all declined significantly in intervention hospitals and worsened over time in comparison hospitals. Nurse work environment scores improved in the intervention hospitals and worsened in the comparison hospitals. Quality of care, patient safety, and operational failures markedly improved in the intervention hospitals and generally worsened in the comparison hospitals.

conclusionsThe quasi-experimental study design gives policymakers and hospital administrators strong confidence that minimum nurse staffing policy interventions can result in more favorable work environments for nurses, better job outcomes including lower nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction, and improvements in quality of care and safety for patients.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalPatient SafetyPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingBurnout, ProfessionalHumansJob SatisfactionQuality of Health CareQueenslandBurnoutHospitalsNursingPolicyStaffing

Identifiers

PMID40845827
PMCPMC13248937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.