ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2025
Experimentally measured lumbar skin strains during functional movements.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidirectional strain-insensitive stretchable RF electronics.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been an influx of skin-adhered wearables that have begun to show promise for their ability to continuously monitor spinal kinematics based on skin deformation for assessing spine-related problems including low-back pain. However, a lack of information regarding the amount of stretch (or strain) that lumbar skin experiences when wearers perform uniplanar or multiplanar movements makes the designing of these wearables difficult. In this study, skin motion was measured using a relatively dense grid of small reflective markers during 6 uniplanar, 4 multiplanar, and 1 activity of daily living (ADL) movements of increasing functionality. These data were used to compute dynamic, inhomogeneous, anisotropic strain fields of lumbar skin based on large deformation strain theory. Of particular note, macroscopic principal strains were highest in Flexion, reaching averages as high as 103 %, with strain rates up to 151 % per second. Principal strain orientations were movement dependent. Males exhibited higher principal strains than females during Flexion (p = 0.0027) and Sit To Stand (p = 0.0453) motions. Repeatability was high between repetitions, ranging from 71.1 % (extension) to 97.2 % (Sit To Stand motion). Skin strain fields were sensitive to both underlying spinal geometry and dermal collagen fiber orientations. The results of this study are relevant to the precision of spinal-specific wearables when placed on different regions of the lumbar skin and may also have clinical relevance to choice of surgical incision orientation and wound care in the lumbar region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.