ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Neglected uterine perforation on a molar pregnancy: Case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSilent uterine perforation following aspiration for molar pregnancy is a rare but critical complication that can significantly impact maternal prognosis. Early detection and prompt intervention are crucial to prevent severe outcomes. This case highlights the importance of vigilant follow-up and clinical suspicion in managing such cases. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-years-old patient, presented 1 month after an aspiration procedure on a molar pregnancy with abdominal pain, physical examination found tachycardia, hypotension, minimal vaginal bleeding and significant pain on uterine mobilization. Ultrasound showed a discontinuity on the uterin wall on the fundus and abundant peritoneal fluid reaching Morison's pouch. The patient underwent surgery with conservative treatment. DISCUSSION: Uterine perforation after aspiration for molar pregnancy is a rare but serious complication, often requiring prompt surgical intervention. Delayed symptoms, such as abdominal pain and shock, may complicate diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of strict follow-up, as failure to monitor beta-hCG levels can lead to severe outcomes. While uterine perforations commonly occur at the fundus, complications like massive hemorrhage or hemoperitoneum may arise. This report emphasizes the critical role of early monitoring, early detection, and prompt intervention in improving maternal prognosis after molar pregnancy evacuation.
conclusionSilent uterine perforation after molar pregnancy evacuation is a serious, often overlooked complication. Prompt recognition, diligent follow-up, and regular monitoring of beta-hCG levels are essential for preventing severe outcomes and improving maternal prognosis in such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.