ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Magnetoencephalography distributed source modeling identifies spatiotemporal propagation patterns of interictal epileptiform discharges.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMagnetoencephalography (MEG) is an important adjunctive method used to localize interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). The equivalent current dipole (ECD) method, the current gold standard modeling approach, identifies a single point source of activity. However, IEDs propagate widely and may be better represented by distributed source modeling approaches. Here, we investigate how areas of maximal IED-related activity estimated using dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) compare to dipoles and surgical resections.
methodsWe analyzed resting-state MEG recordings from 38 NIH patients. We localized areas of IED-related activity along the IED rising phase and peak using spatial clustering of the top 5% of dSPM activations, comparing localizations to ECD and surgical resection areas in seizure free patients.
resultsWe identified dominant primary activation clusters in all patients and non-primary clusters in 24/38 patients. Dipoles localized closer to primary than non-primary clusters. In 12 post-operative seizure-free patients, the primary cluster center of mass was significantly closer to the resected area than dipoles and more stable over time.
conclusionsDistributed source modeling adds to our understanding of IED propagation patterns and may be useful in IED localization for epilepsy surgery planning. SIGNIFICANCE: dSPM enhances pre-surgical planning by refining IED localization, potentially improving surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.