Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845310›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Should Digital Interventions for HIV Self-Testing Be Regulated with World Health Organization Prequalification?

Alex Emilio Fischer, Samanta Tresha Lalla-Edward, Vinodh Edward, Musaed Abrahams, Luke Shankland, John de Wit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex Emilio FischerDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Public Health, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 31 302538252.ORCID 0000-0002-6882-7245
Samanta Tresha Lalla-EdwardEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witswatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-1643
Vinodh EdwardDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Public Health, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 31 302538252.ORCID 0000-0003-3952-4760
Musaed AbrahamsAviro Health, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2420-6954
Luke ShanklandAviro Health, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9231-9155
John de WitDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Public Health, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 31 302538252.ORCID 0000-0002-5895-7935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: HIV self-testing (HIVST) allows people to test for HIV outside traditional health facilities, but this presents challenges around pre- and posttest counseling, reporting results, and linking to care. Digital interventions for HIVST, a type of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), have been shown to address these challenges, but there is currently no standardized system for regulating or approving these interventions. The World Health Organization Prequalification Program (WHOPQ) is an international regulatory body that approves vaccines, medications, and in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) for low- and middle-income countries that do not have the capacity to do their own approvals. This paper explores whether WHOPQ could be used to prequalify digital interventions for HIVST. Over half the World Health Organization (WHO) member states have national regulatory bodies for medical devices, but low- and middle-income countries, especially in Africa, do not have the capacity to regulate medical devices, let alone SaMD. This gap parallels the gap in vaccine regulation that initially led to the development of WHOPQ, and while sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled SaMD are being developed, digital interventions for HIVST could be used as a low-risk test case for prequalification of SaMD. The WHOPQ already has a strong history with HIV; over half the WHOPQ funding is from HIV-related funders and half of all prequalified medicines and IVDs are for treatment and diagnosis of HIV; however, only 2% are manufactured in Africa. If digital interventions for HIVST become prequalified, this could improve interoperability and ensure quality, accelerating their adoption at scale. However, care must be taken to remove barriers for African developers and ensure that prequalification does not delay access to people testing for HIV.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHIV TestingSelf-TestingHumansWorld Health OrganizationaccessibilityAfricadigital healthHIV self-screeningHIV testingLMIClow- and middle-income countriesSoftware as a Medical Devicevaccinationvaccine regulationWHOWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID40845310
PMCPMC12373297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.