Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845300›Full record

ReviewJMIR nursing2025

Large Language Models in Nursing Education: Concept Analysis.

Julia Harrington, Richard G Booth, Kimberley T Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia HarringtonArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, N6A 3K7, Canada, 1 519-661-3395.ORCID 0009-0003-1373-8450
Richard G BoothArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, N6A 3K7, Canada, 1 519-661-3395.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-9954
Kimberley T JacksonArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, N6A 3K7, Canada, 1 519-661-3395.ORCID 0000-0002-6541-6213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in nursing education, yet their conceptual foundations remain abstract and underexplored. This concept analysis addresses the need for clarity by examining the relevance, meaning, contextual applications, and defining attributes of LLMs in nursing education, using Rodgers' evolutionary method. Objective: This paper aims to explore the evolutionary concept of LLMs in nursing education by providing a concept analysis through a comprehensive review of the existing published literature. Methods: Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method was used. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar were used to search for relevant publications. A total of 41 papers were included based on inclusion criteria that focused on studies published in English within the last 5 years to ensure relevance to the current use of LLMs exclusively in nursing education. Studies were excluded if they focused on clinical nursing applications, were not available in English, lacked full-text accessibility, or examined other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies unrelated to LLMs (eg, robotics). Results: As a result of this analysis, a proposed definition of LLMs in nursing education has been developed, describing them as accessible, personalized, innovative, and interactive tools that create revolutionary learning experiences, often leading to enhanced cognitive and skill development and improvement in learning and teaching quality. Conclusions: This concept analysis highlights LLMs' transformative potential to enhance access to resources, support individualized learning, and augment nursing education. While promising, careful attention must be given to their limitations and ethical implications, ensuring their integration aligns with the values and goals of nursing education, particularly in specialized areas such as graduate nursing programs.

Indexed as

Concept FormationEducation, NursingLanguageModels, EducationalHumansLarge Language Modelsartificial intelligenceconcept analysisgraduate nursing educationlarge language modelsnursing educationundergraduate nursing education

Identifiers

PMID40845300
PMCPMC12373302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.