Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845167›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

A gene-based model of fitness and its implications for genetic variation: linkage disequilibrium.

Parul Johri, Brian Charlesworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parul JohriDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4003-7719
Brian CharlesworthInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-355X

Funding

Jointly modeling the effects of evolutionary processes on genomic variationR35GM154969 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Parul Johri · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM154969NIH HHS R35GM154969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A widely used model of the effects of mutations on fitness (the "sites" model) assumes that heterozygous recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations at different sites in a gene complement each other, similarly to mutations in different genes. However, the general lack of complementation between major effect allelic mutations suggests an alternative possibility, which we term the "gene" model. This model assumes that a pair of heterozygous deleterious mutations in trans behave effectively as homozygotes, so that the fitness of trans-heterozygotes are lower than those of cis-heterozygotes. We examine the properties of the two different models, using both analytical and simulation methods. We show that the gene model predicts positive linkage disequilibrium (LD) between deleterious variants within the coding sequence under conditions when the sites model predicts zero or slightly negative LD. We also show that focusing on rare variants when examining patterns of LD, especially with Lewontin's D' measure, is likely to produce misleading results with respect to inferences concerning the causes of the sign of LD. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled; it is less likely to produce negative LD under the gene model than the sites model. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to patterns of LD in natural populations of several species.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessGenetic VariationLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticAnimalsComputer SimulationEpistasis, GeneticHumansMutationcomplementationdominanceepistasisfitness modelslinkage disequilibrium

Identifiers

PMID40845167
PMCPMC12606437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.