Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845158›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

CDACHIE: chromatin domain annotation by integrating chromatin interaction and epigenomic data with contrastive learning.

Asato Yoshinaga, Osamu Maruyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asato YoshinagaGraduate School of Design, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.
Osamu MaruyamaFaculty of Design, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5760-1507

Funding

KAKENHI JP23K21718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationChromatin domain annotation identifies functional genomic regions, such as active and inactive zones, based on epigenomic features like histone modifications, DNA methylation, and chromatin accessibility. While recent methods have utilized both chromatin interaction data (e.g. Hi-C) and epigenomic data, they often overlook the direct relationship between these data types.

resultsIn this study, we introduce Chromatin Domain Annotation using Contrastive Learning for Hi-C and Epigenomic Data (CDACHIE), a method for identifying chromatin domains from Hi-C and epigenomic data. Our approach leverages contrastive learning to generate aligned representative vectors for both data types at each genomic bin. The concatenated vectors are then clustered using K-means to classify distinct chromatin domain types. CDACHIE achieves superior performance in Variance Explained, evaluated across gene expression, replication timing, and ChIA-PET data. This highlights its robust ability to integrate semantic associations between Hi-C and epigenomic features within the embedding space. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code is available at GitHub: https://github.com/maruyama-lab-design/CDACHIE. An archival snapshot of the code used in this study is available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15751780.

Indexed as

ChromatinEpigenomicsMachine LearningMolecular Sequence AnnotationSoftwareHumansChromatin

Identifiers

PMID40845158
PMCPMC12422559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.