Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40845070›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Antibiotic use in companion animals in veterinary teaching hospitals in Thailand.

Sarin Suwanpakdee, Boonrat Chantong, Anuwat Wiratsudakul, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Angkana Lekagul, Walasinee Sakcamduang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarin SuwanpakdeeDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1679-0751
Boonrat ChantongDepartment of Pre-clinical and Applied Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Anuwat WiratsudakulDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Angkana LekagulInternational Health Policy Program Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Walasinee SakcamduangDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-9506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high volume of antibiotics used for companion animals, off-label use of human-registered antibiotics for veterinary purposes, and close human-animal interactions raises policy concerns related to antimicrobial resistance in companion animals. This study aimed to assess the volume and type of antibiotic usage in companion animals at veterinary teaching hospitals in Thailand. In 2018, we obtained a dataset of visits that occurred between 2015 and 2017 from eight selected veterinary teaching hospitals with a high caseload of companion animals. In total, we included 938,522 dogs and 242,342 cats in our study. Total antibiotic consumption was estimated, and antibiotic usage was standardized by calculating the amount of antibiotic consumed by weight per year (mg/kg/year). The top five antibiotics used include amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, enrofloxacin, cephalexin, doxycycline, and metronidazole, all of which are commonly used to treat bacterial and parasitic infections. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, such as amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and enrofloxacin, were among the most used. From 2015 to 2017, total antibiotic usage (kg) markedly decreased (i.e., by 57.0%), with a particularly notable reduction of 78.2% observed for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Moreover, veterinarians' overall prescriptions of antibiotics registered for human use decreased by 16% over the same period. However, there was a notable increase in the use of injectable antibiotics registered for human use relative to oral forms. Furthermore, we observed a relatively high usage of third-generation cephalosporins, which may contribute to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in companion animals. This study emphasizes the need to educate veterinarians and veterinary students on the rational use of antibiotics and highlights the importance of regular monitoring and surveillance of antibiotic use in companion animals.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHospitals, AnimalPetsAnimalsCatsDogsHospitals, TeachingHumansThailandAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40845070
PMCPMC12373224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.