ArticlePloS one2025
Extracting rubber tree parameters and estimating carbon storage using airborne LiDAR.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stand Height Increment from Two-Epoch Aerial Laser Scanning Data and Inventory Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facing the dual challenges of global warming and carbon neutrality, forestry carbon sinks play a vital role in achieving carbon neutrality. Rubber plantations, in particular, offer significant ecological and economic co-benefits. However, the efficient and rapid acquisition of data on rubber plantations and the calculation of carbon stock remain key challenges in forestry carbon sink studies. Airborne LiDAR is a powerful tool for forest surveys, yet its inability to directly measure DBH remains a major limitation. This study seeks to address this issue. High-resolution point cloud data were collected, followed by noise removal and ground point classification. Four individual tree segmentation methods were compared, and a linear regression model based on crown diameter parameters was proposed to estimate DBH. The results indicate that the direct point cloud segmentation method achieved the highest accuracy in tree identification. The proposed linear regression model for DBH estimation effectively predicts DBH, enabling precise biomass estimation. The total biomass estimated in the study area was 592,770.57 kg (aboveground biomass: 550,336.17 kg, belowground biomass: 42,434.39 kg), with the corresponding total carbon stock estimated at 278,602.17 kg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.