ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Discharge policies and care practices for children with suspected sepsis: A health facility scan at a nationally representative sample of hospitals and health centres in Uganda.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Under-five children in low- and middle-income countries remain at high risk of death after hospital discharge. However, few studies have systematically assessed discharge processes or facility readiness to support safe transitions of care. This study aimed to assess health facility readiness to provide pediatric discharge care for children under five years of age and current discharge practices in a nationally representative sample of health facilities in Uganda. A cross-sectional health facility scan was conducted between October 2020 and May 2021 at 36 facilities providing inpatient pediatric care in Uganda. Primary outcomes included: (1) facility readiness for pediatric discharge, defined as availability of infrastructure, technology, forms/job aids, and equipment; and (2) observed discharge care practices, including caregiver counselling, provision of take-home materials, post-discharge risk assessment, referrals, and clinical assessments on the day of discharge. Secondary outcomes included discrepancies between reported versus observed discharge care practices, discharge relevant admission practices, as well as caregiver and health worker satisfaction. Thiry-six health facilities were enrolled and 180 pediatric discharge observations, 180 caregivers, and 180 health workers were assessed. Hospitals had higher readiness scores in infrastructure (p < 0.001), technology (p = 0.006), and equipment (p = 0.021) than health centres. Hospitals also performed better in the provision of discharge risk assessment, clinical assessment on the day of discharge, follow-up, and provision of take-home materials. In contrast, health centres more consistently provided discharge counselling (p = 0.021) and had higher counselling topic scores (p < 0.001). Overall, 82.8% of discharges included a clinical assessment, 31.1% included a follow-up referral, and 26.1% included a risk assessment. Observed practices often diverged from reported procedures. These findings identified several priority areas for quality improvement in both resource availability and discharge care delivery in all settings. Standardizing discharge policies and tools may strengthen discharge care and may be used as a guide to inform national-level pediatric discharge policies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.