ArticlePloS one2025
Elucidating trends and underlying drivers of neonatal mortality stagnation in Nepal: An analytical perspective on the 2016 and 2022 Demographic and Health Surveys.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07574944 (Effectiveness of Simulation-based Training Delivered to Special Newborn Care Providers on Resuscitation Management and Kangaroo Mother Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Simulation-based Training Delivered to Special Newborn Care Providers on Resuscitation Management and Kangaroo Mother Care (STAR-Baby Trial)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNepal has made significant progress in reducing the Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR) over the past two decades. However, since 2016, NMR has stagnated at 21 deaths per 1,000 live births, indicating stalled improvements in neonatal survival. Past studies highlighted the disparities, with socioeconomically disadvantaged groups experiencing a higher rate of neonatal deaths. However, limited evidence exists on NMR trends and determinants in Nepal that examined the factors with the trend. This study analyzed NMR trends and key determinants using data from the two most recent Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys (NDHS).
methodsNDHS 2016 and NDHS 2022 data were used to calculate NMR. Both surveys received ethical approval from the Nepal Health Research Council. The study included 106 neonatal deaths out of 5,087 live births in 2016 and 105 out of 5,192 in 2022. Independent variables included household characteristics, parental factors, pregnancy-related factors, maternal and newborn care, women's empowerment, and health system factors. NMRs were constructed using births within completed months from 1 to 61. A general linear model assessed NMR trends, while logit regression identified key determinants.
resultsWhile national NMR remained unchanged since 2016, an increasing trend was observed among disadvantaged groups and mothers who did not utilize maternal/newborn health services. NMR rose from 27.3 to 27.8 per 1,000 live births (p = 0.001) among poor and poorest households. Similarly, women with no education experienced higher NMR at 29.3% in 2022 compared to 25.7% in 2016 (p = 0.002). Maithili-speaking mothers had higher NMR (27.4 in 2022 vs. 23.4 in 2016, p < 0.001). Women lacking decision-making power in healthcare had higher NMRs of 25.9 in 2022 vs. 23.4 in 2016 (p = 0.021). Women who were not assisted by skilled birth attendants (SBA). had significantly higher NMR compared to those, who were assisted by SBA (p = 0.010).
conclusionsTargeted health system interventions are needed for disadvantaged groups covering those who had low education, from poor households, low health care decision making and lack access to SBA assisted delivery. While determinants have been explored, further targeted studies are warranted to uncover the causes of neonatal deaths in Nepal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.