ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Nurses' experiences with inhospital continuous monitoring of vital signs in general wards: A systematic review.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of stress-ball play on pain and physiological responses during port-a-cath needle insertion in children undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Radar-Based Contactless Monitoring in Different Inpatient Nursing Care Settings: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments make the continuous monitoring of vital signs outside the critical care setting feasible, and may provide a benefit in terms of improved patient outcomes and cost efficiency. A meta-aggregative systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of the experiences of nurses working with continuous monitoring of vital signs in patients admitted to a hospital general ward. All study designs describing nurses' experiences in a qualitative manner were included. Relevant studies were identified by searching the electronic databases Pubmed, Cinahl and Embase from 2017 up to September 2024. The search strategy combined 'nurses', 'continuous monitoring/measuring', 'vital signs', and 'hospital/(general) wards' as well as synonyms. Of 3066 articles found, nine were included. Four themes were synthesized: 1) Emotional and practical advantages, e.g., patients feel safer and nurses feel more secure, as continuous monitoring detects patients deterioration earlier; 2) practical disadvantages, e.g., reduced nurse-patient interaction and stress related to changing vital signs, potential over-monitoring and data overloading; 3) important aspects related to the implementation process, e.g., training and coaching, properly working technical infrastructure; and 4) alarm strategies and clinical assessment, e.g., reducing unnecessary alarms. We conclude that nurses report varying experiences in working with continuous monitoring of vital signs on the general ward. The advantages of continuous monitoring seem to justify investing in further development of the systems and sensors in order to reduce the practical disadvantages. The findings may facilitate optimal implementation of continuous monitoring of vital signs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.