ArticlePloS one2025
Understanding the evolving treatment landscape of hidradenitis suppurativa: An analysis of All of Us.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuropathic Pain Management Using Novel Biologics in Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Hidradenitis suppurativa: epidemiology, diagnosis, molecular pathogenesis and therapy.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition with significant burden for affected patients. The development of new therapies in the last decade has brought hope for better patient outcomes, but understanding the use of these new drug classes is necessary to ensure patient access to care.
methodsWe analysed data from 2636 HS patients within NIH's All of Us research program from June 2017 and October 1, 2023 to examine the likelihood of patients receiving certain classes of drugs based on socio-demographic factors and comorbid health conditions, as well as how these drug classes impact quality of life. We also examined trends in the number of prescriptions over time.
resultsAntibiotics were most frequently prescribed, with higher numbers administered to females. Small molecule inhibitors and biologic medications were prescribed at low levels. We found that socio-demographic factors such as ethnicity, income and insurance provider influence the types of drugs patients are most likely to receive, with African American individuals more likely to receive antibiotics and immunosuppressive drugs and less likely to receive small molecule inhibitors. We also found that comorbid conditions significantly influence the likelihood of patients receiving specific drugs, with higher odds of receiving biologics if a patient has a comorbid rheumatic/autoimmune disorder. Antibiotics and immunosuppressive drugs were associated with less favourable quality of life measures, as well as a higher likelihood of anxiety and depression.
conclusionsThis work uncovers the varied landscape of HS treatment in the US and highlights the factors that influence treatment choices and how these treatments impact quality of life. It also provides an understanding of the social disparities that some populations face when accessing HS care, informing future decisions and practices to reduce these inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.