ArticlePloS one2025
Prevention of adolescent stimulant drug use: Do the home life environment and extracurricular activities influence this? Findings from the Irish Planet Youth Survey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pornography use and its association with risk taking sexual behaviours among Irish adolescents.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Behavioral and social pathways of adolescent drug use in Indonesia: implications for community-based prevention.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStimulant drug use during adolescence (e.g., cocaine or ecstasy) can lead to a myriad of adverse health effects, but it remains uncertain how the home life environment and involvement in structured extracurricular activities may correlate with teenage stimulant use.
methodsWe conducted an analysis utilising data from the 2020 Planet Youth survey, an anonymous questionnaire administered to school-going adolescents in the western region of Ireland. All adolescents with complete demographic information on age, gender and drug use were included in the analysis. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with adolescent lifetime cocaine or ecstasy use. Exposure variables of interest were factors associated with the home environment (parental rule-setting, parental monitoring, being outside after midnight), mental health, intergenerational closure (defined as the extent of connectedness between adolescents and their peers, parents of their peers, and between parents themselves) and adolescent participation in extracurricular activities (sports, arts, volunteering, and/or afterschool clubs). Limitations of this study included its cross-sectional design which precluded causal inferences, self-reported data which may lead to information and social desirability biases, respectively, as well as adolescents who were not enrolled in formal education being excluded from the sampling frame.
resultsIn total, 167 out of 4890 (3.4%) and 136 out of 4895 (2.8%) adolescents had previously used cocaine and ecstasy, respectively. Almost half of the participants in both datasets were female (49.7%), and the majority were aged 16 years (62.8% and 62.7% of the cocaine and ecstasy samples, respectively). Being outside after midnight during the previous week was associated with lifetime stimulant use (cocaine AOR = 5.63, 95%CI: 3.98,7.97; ecstasy AOR = 6.37, 95%CI: 4.36,9.30) (vs. never). Adolescents who reported "bad/very bad" mental health had over three times the odds of previous cocaine use (AOR = 3.63, 95%CI: 2.39, 5.49), and over five times the odds of previous ecstasy use (AOR = 5.15, 95%CI: 3.09, 8.59) (vs. "good/very good"). A lack of parental rule-setting (cocaine AOR = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.10, 1.50; ecstasy AOR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.17,1.64), lack of parental monitoring (cocaine AOR = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.58,2.06; ecstasy AOR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.86, 2.48), and reduced intergenerational closure (cocaine AOR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.18,1.58; ecstasy AOR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.34,1.83) were associated with lifetime stimulant use. Teenagers who did not participate regularly in sport had increased odds of previous cocaine use (in a club/team AOR = 1.50, 95%CI: 1.06,2.11; outside of a club/team AOR = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.03,2.04) and ecstasy use (in a club/team AOR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.05,2.27; outside of a club/team AOR = 1.79, 95%CI: 1.56,3.12).
conclusionThe prevalence of stimulant use among this sample of Irish adolescents is relatively high by European standards, particularly cocaine use. Reduced parental rule-setting, supervision and family bonding time was associated with higher odds of adolescent stimulant use. Regular involvement in sports may have a protective effect against adolescent stimulant drug use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.