Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40844975›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Design principles for social-ecological research at the landscape scale applied to western Rwanda.

Matthias Baumann, Dula Duguma, Susanne Vögele, Meike Wollni, Ping Sun, Gaelle Ndayizeye, Joern Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias BaumannGeography Department, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2375-3622
Dula DugumaSocial-Ecological Systems Institute (SESI) Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana Universität, Lüneburg, Germany.
Susanne VögeleDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8287-3886
Meike WollniDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ping SunSocial-Ecological Systems Institute (SESI) Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana Universität, Lüneburg, Germany.
Gaelle NdayizeyeDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Joern FischerSocial-Ecological Systems Institute (SESI) Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana Universität, Lüneburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-8978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Place-based social-ecological systems research provides major opportunities to advance sustainability and often involves large, interdisciplinary groups. Researchers adopt various methodologies when studying landscapes, gathering a wide array of data such as socioeconomic information from households, ecological data from specific areas, and qualitative insights from interviews. To integrate these varied methods, we propose identifying social-ecological research units as shared anchor points for data collection across teams. We outline four design principles: (i) spatial scale of social-ecological units, (ii) key social-ecological gradients in the study area, (iii) accessibility of stratification data, and (iv) flexibility in response to logistical challenges. We applied these principles to design a social-ecological study on ecosystem restoration in western Rwanda. We identified five distinct and spatially homogenous clusters, from which we sampled a total of 152 villages (~9.5% of all villages in our study area), which will be visited by different researchers within our study consortium, hence enabling to identify cross-sectional similarities and differences. Through our stratification according to these principles, we created a framework to guide interdisciplinary collaboration. This structured approach supports integration of diverse research efforts and offers insights for advancing place-based social-ecological systems research globally. Sharing our stratification data and methodology, we highlight its potential applicability to other landscapes and sustainability challenges.

Indexed as

EcologyInterdisciplinary ResearchResearch DesignSociologyHumansResearch PersonnelRwandaSustainable Development

Identifiers

PMID40844975
PMCPMC12373253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.