Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40844847›Full record

ArticleJournal of interpersonal violence2026

Family Violence Risk on Entry to the Family Courts of Australia: Profiles and Predictive Validity of the DOORS Triage Process.

Yvonne D Wells, Jennifer E McIntosh, Felicity L Painter, Amy Holtzworth-Munroe, Bradley J Wright, Heng Jiang, Jamie Lee, Kristel A Krella, Anna T Booth, Elizabeth Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yvonne D WellsLa Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9678-5580
Jennifer E McIntoshLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-5003
Felicity L PainterLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Amy Holtzworth-MunroeIndiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Bradley J WrightLa Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Heng JiangLa Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jamie LeeLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2126-4534
Kristel A KrellaLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-5209-2301
Anna T BoothLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-4778
Elizabeth EvansFederal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Family DOORS Triage Tool is a self-report measure of family violence victimization and perpetration risk, completed by parties on filing or responding to a parenting matter in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Divisions 1 and 2), collectively "the Courts." The tool and associated risk rubric inform subsequent risk response processes within the Courts. We sought to test the tool's utility and fitness-for-purpose within a new family violence response initiative by the Courts. Data from 4,175 adults, collected using the Family DOORS Triage Tool and Court intake records, were used to examine (a) self-reported family violence risk profiles and risk factor clustering; (b) the tool's acceptability across key sub-groups (using time to completion as a measure of engagement); and (c) the tool's fitness-for-purpose against the results of subsequent file review by designated court officers. Concern for one's own safety was the most frequently reported risk. Allocation to a high-risk category was associated with gender (higher for women), applicant status (higher for respondents), culturally and linguistically diverse background status, more recent separation, recent communication with the other party, and having younger children. Survey completion was fastest for those who reported high risk or identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. Risk category was a strong predictor of subsequent referral to the high-risk case management pathway following assessment and file review. Parties who initially self-reported high risk but were reclassified to low/medium risk on file review were more likely to be men, to report low fear for their own safety, and to be in recent communication with their former partner. The Family DOORS Triage Tool coupled with the Court's risk rubric demonstrates high utility and acceptability to vulnerable sub-populations. The tool may provide a means to detect and respond rapidly and accurately to clusters of risk early in engagement with family court systems.

Indexed as

Domestic ViolenceTriageAdolescentAdultAustraliaCrime VictimsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsYoung Adultcourtfamily violenceriskscreeningseparationtriage

Identifiers

PMID40844847
PMCPMC13669445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.