Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Plus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04124601 (Neoadjuvant CHemoradiotherapy With Sequential Ipilimumab and NivOlumab in RECtal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neoadjuvant CHemoradiotherapy With Sequential Ipilimumab and NivOlumab in RECtal Cancer (CHINOREC): a Prospective Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase II Clinical Trial
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in proficient MMR rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Nonlinear duration-efficacy association of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with chemoradiotherapy in pMMR/MSS locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Error in Figure 1.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Can Chemoradiotherapy Expand Immune Checkpoint Blockade Responsiveness in Mismatch Repair-Proficient Rectal Cancer?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Autologous tumor-immune effusion cocultures enable ex vivo functional profiling of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- Cellular characteristics of the immune microenvironment of colorectal cancer and progress in immunotherapy research.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show efficacy in treatment of several solid tumors, but microsatellite-stable rectal cancer is largely resistant. Radiotherapy may enhance tumor immunogenicity and thus may make the combination of radiotherapy and ICIs a promising strategy to treat rectal cancer. While anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies in neoadjuvant regimens have been linked to higher complete response rates, the added benefit of including a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of combining ipilimumab and nivolumab with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: The CHINOREC trial was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial conducted from June 2, 2020, to March 15, 2024, across multiple academic and tertiary medical centers in Austria. Analysis was based on intention to treat. Intervention: Neoadjuvant CRT consisted of 50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions with concurrent capecitabine (1650 mg/m2/d). The experimental arm received additional intravenous ipilimumab (1 mg/kg on day 7) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks starting on day 14) (CRT plus ipilimumab and nivolumab group). Surgical resection was performed 10 to 12 weeks after CRT. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the safety and feasibility of combining CRT with sequential ipilimumab and nivolumab, assessed by surgical complications and reoperation rates. Secondary outcomes included clinical and pathological response rates. Results: Of the 145 patients assessed, 80 were randomized to receive either CRT alone (CRT group) (n = 30) or to the CRT plus ipilimumab and nivolumab group (n = 50) (49 male [61%]; median age, 60 [range, 36-83] years). Differences in surgical complication rates were not statistically significant between the CRT and CRT plus ipilimumab and nivolumab groups (any grade, 20 of 26 patients [77%] vs 33 of 43 [77%]; P > .99), as were reoperation rates (2 of 26 [8%] vs 3 of 43 [7%]; P > .99). Major pathological response (10 of 26 [38%] vs 16 of 43 [37%]; P > .99) and complete response (9 of 30 [30%] vs 11 of 50 [22%]; P = .44) rates were overall high in both groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients with rectal cancer, integrating ipilimumab and nivolumab into neoadjuvant CRT was safe and feasible, with no increase in surgical complications. Although complete response rates did not significantly improve, the dual ICI regimen demonstrated promising clinical activity. These findings support further translational research to optimize timing, dosing, and fractionation of radiotherapy and ICI therapy and to guide patient selection. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04124601.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.