SynthesisClinical journal of gastroenterology2026
From pain relief to organ protection: epidural analgesia in acute pancreatitis-a narrative review of its evolving role.
Synthesis in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially life-threatening inflammatory condition with a wide clinical spectrum. In severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), impaired pancreatic microcirculation contributes to necrosis and multiorgan dysfunction. Despite advances in supportive care, therapeutic strategies that directly target pancreatic perfusion remain limited.
objectivesThis narrative review explores the evolving role of epidural analgesia (EA) in SAP, examining its physiological basis, experimental evidence, and clinical outcomes.
methodsLiterature was reviewed on the pathophysiology of pancreatitis, pancreatic microcirculation, and the use of EA in both animal models and human trials. Data from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and cohort studies were synthesized.
resultsEA exerts beneficial effects by blocking thoracic sympathetic outflow, thereby improving splanchnic vasodilation and pancreatic perfusion. Animal studies demonstrated enhanced microcirculatory flow, reduced necrosis, and improved survival. Early clinical studies showed EA reduced enzyme levels, improved pain scores, and enhanced organ function. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found EA to be safe, associated with reduced mortality and ventilatory requirements. However, the EPIPAN trial, a multicenter RCT, found no significant benefit in ventilator-free days and noted a longer duration of mechanical ventilation in EA recipients.
conclusionsEA appears to be a safe adjunct modality in SAP management, offering analgesia and potential organ-protective effects. However, heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes necessitates larger, high-quality trials to clarify its role in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40844757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.