ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Does normal fetal brain imaging in monochorionic twins following co-twin fetal demise eliminate the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome?
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the residual risk of long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in monochorionic twins following co-twin fetal demise and normal fetal brain imaging.
methodsAll monochorionic twin pregnancies with co-twin fetal demise were included. Patients were identified through a search of inpatient medical records for co-twin fetal demise. Cases involving fetal demise following intrauterine procedures (e.g., laser ablation or termination of pregnancy following findings on fetal brain imaging) were excluded. Following co-twin demise, fetal brain imaging, including serial neurosonogram and fetal brain MRI, was performed on the surviving fetus. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed postnatally using standardized age-appropriate developmental evaluation of personal-social, language, gross and fine motor skills, as well as hearing and vision screening. Additionally, parents completed a phone-based adaptive behavior questionnaire using the Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II).
resultsNineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Two patients underwent urgent cesarean delivery due to fetal distress following co-twin demise and did not undergo any imaging. Of the 17 patients who underwent fetal brain imaging, 2 had evidence of CNS injury, one of whom later presented with mild speech delay, and the other who achieved an adequate VABS-II score. Among the fetuses with normal brain imaging and available follow-up, 45.4% (5/11) had abnormal developmental evaluations including one global delay, one motor delay, one mild hypotonia, and two moderately low scores on VABS-II.
conclusionNormal fetal CNS imaging following co-twin fetal demise in monochorionic twins does not guarantee normal neurodevelopmental outcome. This residual risk should be clearly discussed with parents during counseling to aid clinical decision- making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.