ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025
Rural patients' experiences with diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rural patients' experiences with diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRural endometrial cancer (EC) patients are less likely to receive lymph node evaluation, high-quality surgical care, and adjuvant therapy compared to urban patients. Developing interventions to effectively address barriers to quality care requires understanding patient experiences across the cancer care continuum. Our objective was to understand the diagnostic and treatment experiences of rural EC patients.
methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with 23 participants (22 patients, one caregiver) from rural counties in North Carolina. We developed a semistructured interview guide to examine the experiences of patients during diagnosis and treatment. Initial codes were derived from a multilevel conceptual framework of rural cancer control, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsWe identified six themes reflecting determinants of diagnosis and seven themes for treatment of EC for rural patients. Provider knowledge of EC symptoms, patient symptom normalization, and fear were all discussed as major factors impacting delays in EC diagnosis. Participants noted that social networks influenced them to seek care for symptoms they did not otherwise see as concerning. During treatment, participants experienced financial burdens, and many reported significant challenges traveling to treatment. Social networks were critical for financial support and transportation to and from treatment. Personal health care experiences and community perceptions about rural cancer care also influenced decisions about where to seek gynecologic cancer treatment.
conclusionsThis study highlights the need to improve rural provider adherence to guidelines for EC detection, increase symptom knowledge among rural communities, and implement comprehensive assessments of unmet needs of rural patients during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.