GuidelineInfection2025
Practice guidelines for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in Germany.
Guideline in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Saving Beds and Budgets: Real-World Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacoeconomics of Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides (LALs) in a Day Hospital Setting.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe practice guideline for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) aims to encourage broader adoption of OPAT into routine clinical practice in Germany.
methodsThe guideline was developed according to the guideline development framework by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany. Literature search was conducted, and expert recommendations were formulated through consensus and published as an AWMF S1 guideline (expert group recommendations with consensus development in an informal process).
resultsOPAT is a safe and effective alternative to inpatient care for managing selected infectious diseases (ID) entities, which require intravenous antimicrobial therapy (AMT). ID specialists play a critical role in determining the indications for OPAT, the selection of suitable patients and the development of treatment plans. Specialist-led OPAT programs have been shown to enhance treatment efficacy, reduce hospital readmissions, and decrease healthcare costs. A structured, checklist-based approach is used to evaluate infection severity, available therapeutic options, patient comorbidities, and home care conditions. Adherence to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) principles as well as regular clinical and laboratory monitoring are essential to ensure appropriate antimicrobial use and minimize adverse events, catheter-related complications and the risk of resistance. The selection of adequate vascular access is based on patient-specific factors, characteristics of the indicated antimicrobial and treatment duration, optimizing both safety and patient comfort.
conclusionOPAT is a safe, cost-effective alternative to inpatient care, requiring specialists’ ID expertise and AMS. The guideline provides a framework for successful implementation in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.