Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40844670›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2025

The effects of Direct Payments on the well-being of older adults in England.

Jinbao Zhang, Julien Forder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinbao ZhangPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. j.zhang@kent.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-9288
Julien ForderPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-4328

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR 200179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-directed care is a model that allows older adults with disabilities to arrange home- and community-based services flexibly. This study examines the impact of England's self-directed care-Direct Payments-on older adults' well-being and explores how the effects vary among individual characteristics. This study used data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA, 2012-2023) on adults aged 65 and older who used Direct Payments and managed care (N = 568). We used propensity score matching methods to estimate the impact of Direct Payments on unmet needs, depressive symptoms, and quality of life. Direct Payments reduced unmet needs and had non-significant effects on depressive symptoms and quality of life. The beneficial effects of Direct Payments were more salient among older adults who were younger, had experienced less physical loss, and had reported met needs in the preceding survey. Our findings suggest that Direct Payments effectively improve older adults' care outcomes by addressing their unmet needs, with individuals possessing greater health capital being more likely to benefit from using them. Policymakers and practitioners should support the disadvantaged and mitigate disparities in well-being.

Indexed as

Cash for careParticipant-directed carePersonal budgetsPerson-centered careSelf-direction

Identifiers

PMID40844670
PMCPMC12373561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.