ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Optimized conditions for broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Trichosporon spp. to clinical antifungals.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The resistance in Trichosporon species poses a significant challenge in clinical treatment, limiting the efficacy of commonly used antifungal drugs. In this context, T. asahii poses substantial risks as an opportunistic pathogen, especially in immunocompromised patients, where the effective antifungal treatment is also challenged by the absence of standardized testing methods. In this scenario, the present study evaluated and discussed the broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Trichosporon species to fluconazole and amphotericin B. A total of 33 Trichosporon spp. strains, isolated from different sources, along with reference strains, were tested. Different adaptations of the CLSI guidelines were applied to investigate optimal conditions for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination in this genus. The results revealed that fluconazole showed less variation between the tested incubation periods, with reading at 50% inhibition, while amphotericin B demonstrated more accurate results with extended incubation (48 h) and reading at 100% inhibition. Additionally, fluconazole exhibited higher MICs when isolates were incubated at 30 °C, with a range of 1-32 µg/mL, where amphotericin B showed higher MICs at 37 °C, with a range of 0.5-4 µg/mL. This work also reveals significant variability in susceptibility results, underscoring the necessity for standardized testing protocols. Based on the results, the study recommends for the optimal susceptibility testing a 48 h incubation period at 37 °C, with reading breakpoints of 50% inhibition for fluconazole and 100% inhibition for amphotericin B. Yet, this study highlights the urgent need for standardized testing methods and better understanding of antifungal resistance in Trichosporon infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.