Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40844555›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Optimized conditions for broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Trichosporon spp. to clinical antifungals.

Isabela Lima Miranda, Nalu Teixeira Aguiar Peres, Rafael Wesley Bastos, Luana Rossato, Gabriela Silva Cruz, Maria Isabel Azevedo, Kássia Jéssica Galdino Silva, Débora S C M Castelo-Branco, Fabíola Lucini, Daniel Assis Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabela Lima MirandaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil.
Nalu Teixeira Aguiar PeresDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil.
Rafael Wesley BastosNational Institute of Science and Technology in Human Pathogenic Fungi, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Luana RossatoHealth Sciences Research Laboratory, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, 79804-970, MS, Brazil.
Gabriela Silva CruzDepartment of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Center of Biomedicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, 60430-275, CE, Brazil.
Maria Isabel AzevedoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil.
Kássia Jéssica Galdino SilvaDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Biosciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 59078-970, RN, Brazil.
Débora S C M Castelo-BrancoDepartment of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Center of Biomedicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, 60430-275, CE, Brazil.
Fabíola LuciniHealth Sciences Research Laboratory, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, 79804-970, MS, Brazil.
Daniel Assis SantosDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil. dasufmg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-5666

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 408540/2022-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.966527/2024-00Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Comitê Francês de Avaliação da Cooperação Universitária com o Brasil program Código de Financiamento 001Ministério da Saúde 444501/2023-1National Institute of Science and Technology INCT Funvir from Brazil 303762/2020-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resistance in Trichosporon species poses a significant challenge in clinical treatment, limiting the efficacy of commonly used antifungal drugs. In this context, T. asahii poses substantial risks as an opportunistic pathogen, especially in immunocompromised patients, where the effective antifungal treatment is also challenged by the absence of standardized testing methods. In this scenario, the present study evaluated and discussed the broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Trichosporon species to fluconazole and amphotericin B. A total of 33 Trichosporon spp. strains, isolated from different sources, along with reference strains, were tested. Different adaptations of the CLSI guidelines were applied to investigate optimal conditions for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination in this genus. The results revealed that fluconazole showed less variation between the tested incubation periods, with reading at 50% inhibition, while amphotericin B demonstrated more accurate results with extended incubation (48 h) and reading at 100% inhibition. Additionally, fluconazole exhibited higher MICs when isolates were incubated at 30 °C, with a range of 1-32 µg/mL, where amphotericin B showed higher MICs at 37 °C, with a range of 0.5-4 µg/mL. This work also reveals significant variability in susceptibility results, underscoring the necessity for standardized testing protocols. Based on the results, the study recommends for the optimal susceptibility testing a 48 h incubation period at 37 °C, with reading breakpoints of 50% inhibition for fluconazole and 100% inhibition for amphotericin B. Yet, this study highlights the urgent need for standardized testing methods and better understanding of antifungal resistance in Trichosporon infections.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsTrichosporonDrug Resistance, FungalFluconazoleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTrichosporonosisAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleBroth microdilutionClinical antifungalsStandardizationSusceptibility testTrichosporon

Identifiers

PMID40844555
PMCPMC12660568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.