ArticleEpilepsia2025
Standard complete blood count to predict long-term outcomes in febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): A multicenter study.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Outcomes of Tocilizumab Usage in Cryptogenic Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome at Both Acute and Chronic Phase: A Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Standard complete blood count to predict long-term outcomes in febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): A multicenter study.Epilepsia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe investigated whether complete blood count (CBC) analyses during intensive care unit stay could predict 12-month outcomes in patients with cryptogenic febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), a subset of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE).
methodsOutcomes at 12 months were classified as "unfavorable" (Glasgow Outcome Score [GOS] 1-3) or "favorable" (GOS 4-5). Demographic, clinical, and serial CBC data were collected across treatment phases: (1) no immunotherapy (before initiation or no treatment), (2) first-line immunotherapy, and (3) second-line immunotherapy. For each treatment phase, predictive models stratified outcomes based on CBC features using decision tree regression, with separate models for adults and children. Model performance was tested using a leave-one-patient-out approach.
resultsWe studied 63 patients (34 adults, 29 children) from 12 centers. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 18 adults and 12 children. Children were more likely to receive second-line immunotherapy. We analyzed 1530 CBCs (adults: 997 CBCs, including 539 for unfavorable outcomes; children: 533 CBCs, including 415 for unfavorable outcomes). Subgroup analyses revealed differences in CBC levels according to the outcomes and the treatment received. Adults with unfavorable outcomes notably had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios (MLRs), whereas children with unfavorable outcomes had higher red cell distribution width. NLRs and MLRs increased when CBCs were collected after the initiation of immunotherapy for both adults and children. The variables of interest differed in the different predictive models but always included the proportion of at least one subtype of leukocyte. Prediction accuracy with our models was higher in children (87% overall, with the best performance in no-treatment and first-line phases) than in adults (83% overall, with the best performance during/after the initiation of second-line). SIGNIFICANCE: Findings suggest the potential for standard CBCs to serve as a rapid, accessible tool for early prognostication in cryptogenic FIRES, particularly in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.