ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2025
Relationship Between [
Article in European journal of breast health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inter-Observer Reproducibility of [18F]FDG PET/CT Radiomic Features in Primary Breast Carcinoma.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Texture analysis provides crucial prognostic information about many types of cancer, including breast cancer. The aim was to examine the relationship between texture features (TFs) of 2-deoxy-2[ Materials and Methods: TFs of the primary malignant lesion were extracted from PET images of 112 patients. TFs that showed significant differences between patients who achieved one-, three-, and five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and those who did not were selected and subjected to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression method to reduce features and prevent overfitting. Machine learning (ML) was used to predict PFS using TFs and selected clinicopathological parameters. Results: In models using only TFs, random forest predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.730, 0.758, and 0.797, respectively. Naive Bayes predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with AUC values of 0.857, 0.804, and 0.843, respectively. The neural network predicted one-, three-, and five-year PFS with AUC values of 0.782, 0.828, and 0.780, respectively. These findings indicated increased AUC values when the models combined TFs with clinicopathological parameters. The lowest AUC values of the models combining TFs and clinicopathological parameters when predicting one-year, three-year, and five-year PFS were 0.867, 0.898, and 0.867, respectively. Conclusion: ML models incorporating PET-derived TFs and clinical parameters may assist in predicting progression during the pre-treatment period in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.