ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Solo Versus Tandem Cycling Performance: The Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Solo Versus Tandem Cycling Performance: The Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tandem cycling is a Paralympic discipline where two cyclists share one bicycle and requires synchronization and shared effort. In this study, we investigated how individual performance on a solo bicycle compares to tandem cycling. Twelve trained cyclists, that were unfamiliar with tandem cycling, completed a submaximal cycling test, a 30 s Wingate test, and a 10 min time trial under solo and tandem conditions. Performance metrics included gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output, heart rate, and cadence. The results showed that mean power output during the 10 min time trial was significantly lower on a tandem than on a solo bicycle (257 ± 66 W vs. 282 ± 80 W and p = 0.004), whereas cadence was higher (102.0 ± 7.7 rpm vs. 93.6 ± 4.7 rpm and p = 0.002). Gross efficiency, maximal power output, mean power output over 30 s, and heart rate over 10 min did not differ significantly between solo and tandem cycling. These findings suggest that although tandem cycling influences cadence and power, it does not reduce efficiency or short-duration maximal performance. Given the differences in power output and cadence, coaches and athletes should carefully interpret solo cycling performance metrics when applied to tandem racing and training, especially in novice tandem cyclists. Future research should investigate the role of power output matching and tandem experience, and further explore the interaction between pilot and stoker to optimize performance outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.