Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40844292›Full record

ArticlemBio2025

An investigation of gene dosage reveals that increased sensitivity to D-cycloserine divergently impacts the transience of heteroresistance in

Katherine J Sniezek, Mark P Brynildsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine J SniezekDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-9072-8680
Mark P BrynildsenDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5707-8894

Funding

Investigating ploidy modulation as a strategy to improve antibiotic activityR21AI182745 · NIAID · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BRYNILDSEN, MARK P · 2024 to 2025
$450k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R21AI182745NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI182745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heteroresistance describes the phenomenon where seemingly isogenic bacterial populations contain subpopulations with elevated resistance compared to the susceptible majority that are often missed in routine susceptibility testing. The enhanced resistance of those subpopulations can either be maintained (stable) or quickly lost (unstable/transient) after treatment, where transient cases return susceptibility results identical to those of original cultures. Recent work has implicated increased gene dosage of resistance determinants as a major cause of unstable heteroresistance in clinical isolates. Inspired by that work, we sought to systematically evaluate how gene dosage of an antibiotic's target network components impacted heteroresistance and its stability. To accomplish that, we used IMPORTANCE: Heteroresistance is a concern because heteroresistant strains escape clinical detection and facilitate treatment failure. Heteroresistant cells can produce stably resistant or transiently resistant populations, and enhanced understanding of genetic factors that influence the level of heteroresistance and its stability has the potential to improve treatment strategies. Here, we introduce the heteroresistance stability index, which is a quantitative metric of heteroresistance stability, and use it to analyze heteroresistance of

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCycloserineDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliGene DosageEscherichia coli ProteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCycloserineEscherichia coli ProteinscycAddlBheteroresistance stability indexhighest non-inhibitory concentrationUPECUTI89

Identifiers

PMID40844292
PMCPMC12505980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.