ReviewJournal of virology2025
Recent advances in the inference of deep viral evolutionary history.
Review in Journal of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Virus taxonomy and the ICTV - 21 FAQs for the perplexed virologist.The Journal of general virology · 2026Review
- Revealing deep evolutionary relationships between RNA viruses using predicted structural models of viral RNA polymerases.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid rate of virus evolution, while useful for outbreak investigations, poses a challenge for accurately estimating long-term viral evolutionary divergence and leaves us with little genomic traces at deep evolutionary timescales, complicating the reconstruction of deep virus evolutionary history. Recent advancements in protein structure prediction and computational biology have opened up new avenues and enabled us to peer back further in time and with greater clarity than ever before. Here, we review recent approaches to reconstructing the deep evolutionary history of viruses. In particular, we focus on how Bayesian models that account for evolutionary rates that are time-dependent may provide better estimates of the timescale of virus evolution. We then outline approaches to structural phylogenetics and their application to reconstructing the evolutionary history of viruses. Despite current limitations, including structural prediction uncertainty, conformational variation, and limited benchmarking, structural phylogenetics appears promising, particularly where sequence-level homology is eroded. The availability of and ease with which virus structures can now be predicted is likely to drive additional statistical and software developments in this area. Ultimately, answering fundamental questions of virus origins and early diversification, long-term host associations, virus classification, and the timescale of viral diseases will likely require unifying sequence and structural information into a temporally aware evolutionary inference framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.